|
Click on the article you wish you read: Archive
1- Dr Charles Myers - Treatment of Prostrate Cancer | ||
|
| ||
|
Dr Charles Myers visits
Sydney | ||
|
In 1998 Dr Myers, then aged 55, was diagnosed with prostate cancer. His account of how he came to terms with the diagnosis and the steps he took in selecting conformal external beam radiotherapy plus seed implant braccytherapy as his primary treatment, followed by hormone therapy, is a fascinating story in itself. He gives a full description on his web page. Without doubt, Dr Myers' personal experiences as a patient make his views on the disease even more relevant to most patients. As he makes clear in his account, it changed his medical thinking very significantly, particularly on the relevance of screening for prostate cancer. Addressing a sell-out audience in Sydney on 2nd May 2000, Dr Myers opened by stressing that there were several myths about prostate cancer. First, that most men die with, not of, prostate cancer. Second, that most prostate cancer is untreatable and should not be treated. Third, that advanced prostate cancer treated by hormone therapy always becomes resistant to that therapy over time and will inevitably cause death. DIET & HEALTH Dr Myers believes diet has an essential role in successful treatment of prostate cancer. He claims there is strong evidence from randomised trials that diet is a significant factor in the development of prostate cancer. He believes there is much stronger evidence for the benefit of changing diet than there is supporting radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy as effective treatments for the disease. Unfortunately, most doctors in practice today, like him, were taught little if anything at medical school about the role of diet in health. This explains why most doctors are uncomfortable in discussing diet with patients. IMPORTANCE OF ANTI-OXIDANTS He stressed the importance of anti-oxidants in any diet for reducing prostate cancer. Their benefits had been well established in randomised trials and in the laboratory. A clinical trial of 26,000 male smokers in Finland tried to establish if two anti-oxidants, vitamin E and beta-carotene, had any benefit in reducing lung cancer. The results were unexpected. While no benefits were found with lung cancer, the results showed that administering a supplement of vitamin E lead to a 40% reduction in the expected level of deaths from prostate cancer over the five to eight years of the test. According to Dr Myers, testosterone in the presence of prostate cancer produces hydrogen peroxide, which is a strongly oxidising substance. The vitamin E, an anti-oxidant, acts to neutralise the damaging hydrogen peroxide, slowing the progress of the cancer. In the same trial, the group who received beta-carotene and vitamin E combined, experienced a 30% increase in rate of deaths from prostate cancer. It as clear that beta-carotene cancelled the benefit of the vitamin E, a most unexpected outcome! SELENIUM & REDUCTION IN PROSTATE CANCER DEATHS Another anti-oxidant that has been proven to have benefit with most cancers and particularly prostate cancer (by its ability to convert hydrogen peroxide to water) is selenium, particularly the yeast-derived form. Selenium was administered in a randomised trial over 10 years at a dose of 200 micrograms daily to men who were not receiving an adequate quantity naturally in their food supply. Results showed a reduction in prostate cancer deaths of more than 75% in men and initially low PSA's and even up to 64% reduction amongst men with elevated PSA's. Vitamin C, a strong antioxidant, has been shown in the laboratory to prevent testosterone from oxidising prostate cancer, but this has not yet been proved in randomised human trials. Another antioxidant group is carotenoids, the pigment in plants which protect the plant from damage from sunlight. As already mentioned, beta-carotene, although a carotenoid, is converted in the body to vitamin A, so is not effective against prostate cancer. However, lycopene, another carotenoid, is not converted to vitamin A. There is very strong evidence that lycopene can be effective in preventing prostate cancer from developing. VITAMIN D CAN KILL CANCER CELLS Laboratory tests have shown that vitamin D can kill cancer cells. In clinical use, vitamin D was administered to seven patients who had experienced recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Six patients showed reduced PSA's. However, vitamin D in the form offered by most supplements tends to be ineffective. More work is needed to find a form of vitamin D that is more active and easily assimilated. Calcitriol, obtainable by prescription, can be useful as a source of assimilable vitamin D. Dr Myers tests all his patients receiving hormone therapy for the level of calcitriol in their blood. Low calcitriol levels may indicate development of osteoporosis – a common side-effect of hormone therapy. When prostate cancer invades bone, it consumes the calcium. To make up the deficit, other parts of the skeleton are robbed of calcium leading to osteoporosis and pain, especially in joints. RED MEAT AND CANCER TUMOUR GROWTH One of the strongest links with promotion of prostate cancer has been established for dietary fat. Many tests have confirmed that a died rich in red meat and animal fat leads to higher death rates from prostate cancer. Why this is so has been much more difficult to prove. It appears that the culprit is arachnadonic acid, an omega-6 fatty acid found in red meat, animal fat and egg yolk. This fatty acid is converted by prostate cancer cells into a hormone that actively promotes development of the blood vessels (angiogenesis) that cancer tumours need in order to grow. Dr Myers advises all prostate cancer patients to completely eliminate red meat from their diet. He recommends a vegan diet and follows one himself. Dr Myers believes there is evidence linking alpha lineolic acid (the omega-3 fatty acid in flax seed oil) with increased metastatic prostate cancer. Laboratory tests have shown when this substance is placed in contact with live prostate cancer cells, the rate of growth of the cancer cells increases by up to three hundred percent. A similar result was obtained in a test of 15,000 doctors reported in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute in 1994. THE GROUP WHO TOOK OMEGA 3 OILS EXPERIENCED A THREE TIMES GREATER RATE OF PROSTATE CANCER DIAGNOSIS THAN THE REMAINDER. One of Dr Myers patients, who had no detectable prostate cancer, was being treated for high blood cholesterol. The patient's wife persuaded him to take quantities of flax seed oil in hope of reducing his cholesterol. Whin three months, the patient had developed a PSA of 100 with extensive metastatic prostate cancer. These findings were most disturbing as omega-3 from flax oil is considered a strongly anti-cancer agent for other types of cancer. Dr Myers suggests that prostate cancer patients adopt a predominantly vegetarian diet and that, if any oil is consumed, it should be only olive oil and definitely not flax seed oil. In reply to a question, he said that the omega-3 oil in deep-sea fish was harmless to prostate cancer patients, as it was not plant-derived. Summing up on diet, he considers diet is at least as important as any other treatment for prostate cancer. In his experience, a vegan (vegetarian) diet can halve the PSA doubling rate, even for those on watchful waiting. His book 'EATING YOUR WAY TO BETTER HEALTH" has full details of his recommendations and should be read by every prostate cancer patient. Dr Myers welcomes enquiries from patients through his web site, www.prostateforum.com. His monthly magazine, "Prostate Forum", a mine of valuable information, is available by mail or email. A full report of Dr Myers' address can be obtained from the Prostate Cancer Foundation and copies of his book 'EATING YOUR WAY TO BETTER HEALTH" ($45.00) can be obtained by telephoning (02) 9418 7942 (Toll Free 1800 22 00 99). click to go back to the top of the page
| ||
|
Self-Medication: The Treatment of Cancer with
Phenergan Updated | ||
|
Certain drugs acting on the central nervous system possess the additional property of causing injury to tumours by interfering with energy production. Some belong to the large group of drugs known as phenothiazines, many of which have been in use for half a century. Their diverse uses include the treatment of schizophrenia and a variety of other conditions. The active drug in this form of cancer treatment is Phenergan (promethazine), a phenothiazine currently used to quell travel sickness, as an anti-histamine, and as a paediatric sedative. It has the advantage that its effects on the central nervous system are less marked than those of most other phenothiazines. In order to produce its anticancer action the drug has to be taken according to a specific schedule. The maintenance of continuous destructive pressure against malignant growths constitutes an essential feature of the treatment. Phenergan can be freely purchased in the form of 10mg and 25mg tablets, but other phenothiazines are available only on prescription. Formulations in which the drug is provided in conjunction with other drugs should be avoided. What is unusual about this novel and unconventional treatment is that a new chemotherapeutic target is selected within the cancer cell. Anticancer drugs currently in use are supposed to react with DNA located mostly in the nuclei. In marked contrast phenothiazines active against cancer interfere with the production of chemical energy in the power-houses (mitochondria) of malignant cells, and act by intensifying their natural state of partial disablement.
4.
Fourth, treatment is initiated by taking Phenergan as a 50mg dose one
evening at retiring. It is If possible patients should begin to take nutritional supplements several days before starting on Phenergan, and will need to keep going for the entire duration of the treatment. Success depends on maintaining continuous pharmacological pressure against the cancer throughout the entire period of treatment. The advice on offer is gentle and humane; for those with experience of the fiercer forms of chemotherapy and radiotherapy the difference will come as a pleasant surprise. A general improvement in terms of improved sleep, normal appetite, and general wellbeing should be perceptible at least by the end of the first week. In time pain can be expected to dissipate. A record of body weight should be kept. Contraindications and eligibility Cancer patients are unlikely to benefit from this treatment if:
(4) There is dietary supplementation with vitamin E. The question of vitamin E calls for special mention. Recent work has shown that for healthy individuals dietary supplementation (50-100iu daily) is highly beneficial, offering protection not only against the development of cancer but also against coronary heart disease. Unfortunately the same beneficial properties are exploited by cancerous growths, which protect themselves to the disadvantage of the patient. Current advice is therefore to stop supplementation immediately and, if possible, to wait for a week before starting with Phenergan. Most diets contain adequate amounts of the vitamin, the daily requirement being a modest 8-10iu. Existing anticancer drugs are unable to cross the blood-brain barrier; for this reason brain tumours are usually difficult to treat. The sedative action of Phenergan (see below) confirms its ability to gain access to the brain. These patients therefore stand to benefit from the present advice, provided they are not receiving steroids. Simultaneous use of certain chemotherapeutic drugs (cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil, methotrexate) neither block nor interrupt the anti-cancer action of Phenergan. Side effects Drowsiness in the first few days after commencing Phenergan is to be expected and should lessen within a week or two. If not, 10mg tablets can be substituted, with two (20mg) taken at night. Sedation is the principal side effect; on the whole patients do not find the experience unpleasant, but driving a car and using machinery or sharp tools are not recommended, at least for the first fortnight. A small minority of patients may find the therapy insupportable. There are also tiny chances that jaundice may develop within a few days, or that the white cell count may fall (leucopenia or agranulocytosis) after 4-6 weeks. The former can be recognised by a yellowing of the features, the latter by sore throat. Thrombocytopenia (a fall in platelet count) is again highly unlikely, but may be recognised from unexplained bruising or cuts bleeding for longer than usual. In these instances specialist medical attention should be sought immediately, and treatment discontinued. Patients suffering from radiation-induced peripheral neuritis may find that Phenergan will clear the condition up. Duration of treatment The therapy works slowly; just how long it will be necessary to keep taking Phenergan will depend, among other factors, on the extent of disease when treatment is started and on the state of nutrition. Patience is called for. It may be necessary to stay with Phenergan for as long as two years, especially where there are secondary deposits in the bone. What is certain is that the sooner the treatment begins, or, put another way, the smaller the tumour burden is, the quicker the patient may become cancer-free. Conversely, delay confers no advantage. If it is at all possible to start with Phenergan while other treatments are being followed, this would be a better plan than waiting and seeing what the outcome may be. After all, the overriding aim is to get the patient cancer-free as soon as possible. Precautions It is necessary to give up alcohol completely. Sunlight, especially sunbathing and exposure to ultraviolet light, are to be avoided as far as possible. A leaflet is provided with the Phenergan packet; its contents should be read carefully and adhered to. The group of drugs known as monoamine oxidase inhibitors must not be taken in conjunction with Phenergan. The doctor and cancer specialist The help and support of medical advisers must at all costs be enlisted and retained. Accurate reports of progress need to be requested. Being secretive is discourteous; keeping your oncologist fully infortned is essential, and may stimulate genuine interest and additional sympathy. Your doctor is unlikely to have heard of this means of treating cancer, and may be sceptical. In these circumstances the only question one can reasonably expect to have answered is whether harm is likely to ensue. If attempts are made to talk you out of therapy with Phenergan, ask what the dangers of the treatment are perceived to be; reassurance will very likely be given that the risks are negligible. If necessary reference can be made to a paper entitled "Successful Cancer Therapy with Promethazine: the Rationale," published in Medical Hypotheses 46, 25-29 (1996). General advice The success of this treatment depends on various factors, of which one is the state of advancement of the disease. Under no circumstances should Phenergan treatment be discontinued prematurely; if treatment is interrupted before the growth is wholly eliminated, residual tumour cells acquire resistance, and Phenergan will be found to have no anti-tumour effect second time round. No reason is known for this peculiar behaviour, and no means of resensitisation is known at the present tiine. The maxim is: if in doubt, don't quit out. If, after reading the above, uncertainty persists, the question remains: what is there to lose? | ||
|
CANCER TREATMENT PROVED INVALUABLE By CSA member, Jill Royce. | ||
|
Kerry McKernon, a member of one of the Cancer Support Groups in Bunbury, is also convinced that, by adhering to the Phenergan regime, she has for the past twelve months been controlling her Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. Kerry started this treatment after I gave a talk at our local support club. It all started nearly 20 years ago when I underwent radical surgery including skin grafts to remove a large melanoma from my lower right leg. That surgery was successful, but in September 1997, I was diagnosed with low-grade Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. I had very large tumours and the lymphoma was in my bone marrow. I started taking Phenergan and after 3 months - in December 97 - all the tumours had gone and a bone marrow test showed clear. I took Phenergan for another six months and then stopped because I believed I was cured. A few months after ceasing this regime, the tumours slowly started coming back. Twice I tried Phenergan again but it didn't work. During this period I tried many other alternative treatments which I am thankful for because they gave me hope at the time (I don't believe there is a feeling FALSE HOPE - there is only hope or despair). Some of these treatments included: Dr Hoit's injections with chemically altered glucose followed by microwave treatment in an oven; New Zealand green muscle extracts; Dr Budwig's flaxseed oil diet; electromagnetic QRS mat therapy from Germany; Dr Gold's Hydrafine Sulphate (rocket fuel) regime; imported teas from the Amazon; Chinese herbal tea; Essiac tea; and many more. The quest for a cancer control was very expensive and exhausted the credit available from mortgaging our farming property. My husband now has three manual jobs in an attempt to keep paying the interest. He is wonderful and has never complained about the expense. Nothing appeared to be working, and in January this year I reached an imminently life-threatening stage and it was necessary to start a course of oral chemotherapy which could take up to 12 months to control my lymphoma. There was a chance however, that it might not work at all. I began and the tumours slowly started to recede. I continued this treatment for the next five months until my test results showed my white blood count was too low and I had to stop. My tumours had shrunk by approximately 60% at that stage. I was told to wait until my blood count improved and then it would be resumed. I decided to seek another opinion and this specialist said I should stop taking chemotherapy. I agreed and decided to give Phenergan one last chance. I recently read a report by William McWhorter, NCI, on a survey of 6000 people in the book, "Choices In Healing" by Michael Lerner (780262 121804 90000). This report examined the relationship between a history of allergy and the subsequent risk of developing cancer. McWhorter found there was a highly significant positive association between the history of any allergy and the development of any cancer. He found the strongest cancer association was with hives and "lymphatic and hematopoietic malignancies", which include leukaemias, lymphomas, and myelomas. Also in this book, Lerner refers to an article in the Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease, where Maurice Shils supports McWhorter's findings in one significant area. He reports on a series of studies, which document an increased risk of intestinal lymphomas among patients with celiac syndrome, an allergy to gluten. Michael Lerner wonders "whether a diet that may well prevent the development of lymphomas might play some adjunctive role in controlling an established lymphoma, particularly when there is a history of celiac disease." Kerry and I are both allergic to wheat and think we have mild forms of celiac syndrome. Before reading these articles we both included wheat products in our diets. I believe one of our major teaching hospitals in Perth is in the middle of contacting every Lymphoma patient in Western Australia to ask them if they have a wheat intolerance. I have told them of Kerry and my own experiences with taking the anti-histamine Phenergan for cancer control. Is there a link between our wheat allergies, our taking large doses of antihistamine and our success in controlling our Lymphomas? The first time I took Phenergan I was on a vegetable diet and didn’t eat wheat. The subsequent times I took it, I was disillusioned about dieting and ate my normal mixed diet which included wheat. Cancer experts say symptoms of lymphatic cancer can fluctuate naturally and warn it would be misleading to link a period of regression with a course of treatment. Can this be explained by checking if during the periods of remission, the patient is not eating what they are allergic to? Since I was on the news on channel nine in Perth Western Australia, airing my views on the possible link between cancer and allergies, many people have contacted me. There appears to be a pattern emerging from these contacts which link leukaemia, lymphoma and melanoma in blood lines. I know of two members of the Cottesloe Cancer Support Association of Western Australia who have controlled secondary melanoma by adhering to strict diets. I have heard of two young men in their twenties being subjected to harsh treatments and one is an asthmatic with eczema, the other has extreme hay fever. I spoke to an Italian farmer whose mother died of lymphoma and he is battling leukaemia – he feels ill after eating his pasta. I have had melanoma and lymphoma. I am a farmer’s wife with no medical training what so ever. I have outlined Kerry McKernon’s and my own experiences with controlling our Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. It has been a long and arduous journey but we are convinced we have found our answers. My intention for sharing this in the CSA Newsletter and on the CSA Website, is in hope that in some way, some of this information can help another person. We are all different and you must make up your own mind. Whatever you decide, I wish you every success. I know what the enemy can do, and if this is the answer, then the sooner we have a large group of people experiencing control – the better. If you have any success I would be thrilled to hear.
| ||
|
Thank You Doctor
Jones - Your D.I.Y Cancer Treatment Proved Invaluable | ||
|
Once again I am writing to publicly thank Dr. Robert Jones, a Biochemist in London, for saving my life. I have a friend, Kerry who is a member of one of the Cancer Support Groups in Bunbury, a nearby country town. She would also like to add her thanks because she is convinced that, by adhering to Dr Jones' regime on Phenergan, she has for the past 12 months been controlling her low grade Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. She started this treatment after hearing a talk I gave to the Bunbury members. In September, 1997 I was diagnosed with the same low grade Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma. I had very large tumors and the lymphoma was in my bone marrow. I started taking Phenergan after reading an article for Dr. Jones. After 3 months in December 97 all the tumors had gone and a bone marrow test showed clear. I took Phenergan for another six months and then stopped because I believed I was cured. A few months after stopping the tumors slowly started coming back. Twice I tried Phenergan again but it didn't work. In January this year I reached the life threatening stage and it was necessary to start oral chemotherapy. I began and the tumors slowly started to recede and I continued this treatment for the next five months until my tests showed my white blood count was too low and I had to stop. I was told to wait until my blood count improved and then it would be resumed. I decided to seek another opinion and this specialist said I should stop taking chemotherapy. I agreed and decided to give Phenergan one last chance. I have
recently read reports on a study of over 6000 people which was done
in 1988 by Dr. William McWhorter, of the National Cancer Institute
of America. This was followed by comments from Michael Lerner "whether a diet that may well prevent the development of lymphomas might play some adjunctive role in controlling an established lymphoma, particularly when there is a history of celiac disease." Kerry and I are both allergic to wheat and think we have mild forms of celiac syndrome. Before reading these articles we both included wheat products in our diets. I believe one of our major teaching hospitals in Perth is in the middle of contacting every Lymphoma patient in Western Australia asking them if they have a wheat intolerance. I have told them of Kerry's and my experiences with taking the anti-histamine Phenergan for cancer control. Is there a link between our wheat allergies, our taking large doses of antihistamine and our success in controlling our Lymphomas? If this is the case, I am hopeful that, by adhering to a strict gluten free diet and continuing with large amounts of antihistamine my chances of controlling my cancer once again can be high. The first time I took Phenergan I was on a vegetable diet and for nine months didn't eat wheat. The subsequent times I took it I was disillusioned about dieting and ate my normal diet including wheat products. Kerry has been eating wheat products but she didn't have the same degree of wheat intolerance all her life as I had. She is now following a gluten free diet. I have seen evidence that people with other forms of cancer, who have exhausted treatments available for the Medical Profession and have taken Phenergan as a last resort, outliving the survival times given by their specialists. I WANT TO SEND A STRONG MESSAGE TO ALL THE PEOPLE WORKING IN ALL AREAS OF CANCER RESEARCH: IT IS
OBVIOUS TO ME DR ROBERT JONES KNOW PHENERGAN COULD CONTROL CANCER
WHEN HE FIRST STARTED TRYING TO GET SOMEONE TO LISTEN TO HIM TWENTY
SIX YEARS AGO. Get
the book "Choices in healing" by Michael Lerner. Turn to
page 243 and read the reports by William McWhorter, Maurice Shils
and Michael Lerner. Research Page 433 - Joseph Gold- Does hydrazine sulfate prevent weight loss and extend life with cancer? 1968 Research Page 405 - Stanislaw Burzynski - Antineoplastons on the edge of medical credibility, 1974. COME
ON YOU PEOPLE.. I DO ALL MY RESEARCH FOR MY OWN CANCER IN THE SMALL
TOWN OF HARVEY - IN THEIR COUNTRY LIBRARY. I AM TIRED OF SEEING YOUR
GREAT BREAKTHROUGHS THAT MIGHT BE PROVEN IN FOUR OR TEN YEARS TIME.
HOW ABOUT GOING BACK TO THE GRAND DADDIES' RESEARCH? WHY NOT TRY AND
PROVE OR DISPROVE THEIR THEORIES? OR IS IT ALWAYS GOING TO BE THIS
WAY?. BY THE WAY YOU ARE RIGHT - I AM VERY ANGRY THAT SOMETHING WHICH WAS SUSPECTED OF BEING A BREAKTHROUGH TWENTY YEARS AGO MAY NOW BE PROVEN TO HAVE BEEN CORRECT ALL ALONG. WHAT ABOUT ALL THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE DIED AND WHAT ABOUT ME? I COULD HAVE DIED TOO IF IT HAD NOT BEEN FOR DR ROBERT JONES PERSISTING AND NEVER GIVING UP TRYING TO GET PEOPLE TO TAKE SOME NOTICE OF HIM. THANK YOU DR ROBERT JONES You can
get the Phenergan regime off CISS home page http://www.ciss.org.au You can
write enclosing a stamped addressed envelope to |